1. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Report to the president Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods, Washington DC, 2016. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_forensic_science_report_final.pdf.
2. Federal Bureau of Investigation—FBI, Comments on: President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Report to the President on Forensic Science in Federal Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Pattern Comparison Methods. September 20, 2016. www.fbi.gov/file-repository/fbi-pcast-response.pdf/view.
3. National District Attorneys Association—NDAA, Report Entitled Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods. November 16, 2016. http://www.ciclt.net/ul/ndaajustice/PCAST/NDAAPCASTResponseFINAL.pdf.
4. A comment on the PCAST report: skip the match/non-match stage;Morrison;Forensic Sci. Int.,2017
5. Association of Firearm and Tool Mark Examiners AFTE, Response to PCAST Report on Forensic Science. October 31, 2016. https://afte.org/uploads/documents/AFTE_PCAST_Response.pdf.