Validity and reliability of forensic firearm examiners-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Validity and reliability of forensic firearm examiners

Published:2020-02 Issue: Volume:307 Page:110112
ISSN:0379-0738
Container-title:Forensic Science International
language:en
Short-container-title:Forensic Science International

Author:

Mattijssen Erwin J.A.T.,Witteman Cilia L.M.,Berger Charles E.H.,Brand Nicolaas W.,Stoel Reinoud D.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Law

Reference98 articles.

1. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward;Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community: National Research Council,2009

2. The vision in "blind" justice: expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition;Dror;Psychon. Bull. Rev.,2010

3. The forensic confirmation bias: problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions;Kassin;J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn.,2013

4. Building the research culture in the forensic sciences: announcement of a double blind testing program;Stoel;Sci. Justice,2016

5. New application of psychology to law: improving forensic evidence and expert witness contributions;Dror;J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn.,2013

Cited by 37 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Authors' response;Journal of Forensic Sciences;2024-08-26

2. The false promise of firearms examination validation studies: Lay controls, simplistic comparisons, and the failure to soundly measure misidentification rates;Journal of Forensic Sciences;2024-04-29

3. Striated toolmarks comparison and reporting methods: Review and perspectives;Forensic Science International;2024-04

4. A guide to measuring expert performance in forensic pattern matching;Behavior Research Methods;2024-03-14

5. Polygraph-based deception detection and Machine Learning. Combining the Worst of Both Worlds?;Forensic Science International: Synergy;2024