Latent print comparison and examiner conclusions: A field analysis of case processing in one crime laboratory-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Latent print comparison and examiner conclusions: A field analysis of case processing in one crime laboratory

Published:2021-02 Issue: Volume:319 Page:110642
ISSN:0379-0738
Container-title:Forensic Science International
language:en
Short-container-title:Forensic Science International

Author:

Gardner Brett O.^ORCID,Kelley Sharon,Neuman Maddisen^ORCID

Funder

Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Law

Reference16 articles.

1. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward;National Academy of Sciences,2009

2. Report to the President: Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods;President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology,2016

3. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions;Ulery;PNAS,2011

4. Miami-Dade Research Study for the Reliability of the ACE-V Process: Accuracy & Precision in Latent Fingerprint Examinations;Pacheco,2014

5. Expert fingerprint testimony post-PCAST-a Canadian case study;Wilkinson;J. Forensic Identif.,2018

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Error rates and proficiency tests in the fingerprint domain: A matter of perspective and conceptualization;Forensic Science International;2023-07

2. Does image editing improve the quality of latent prints? An analysis of image-editing techniques in one crime laboratory;Science & Justice;2023-01

3. Is the Mark Suitable?;The Forensic Analysis, Comparison and Evaluation of Friction Ridge Skin Impressions;2022-08-04

4. Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance;Forensic Science International;2021-07