Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sisters-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sisters

Published:2016-10 Issue: Volume:267 Page:115-124
ISSN:0379-0738
Container-title:Forensic Science International
language:en
Short-container-title:Forensic Science International

Author:

Zhang Cuiling,Morrison Geoffrey Stewart^ORCID,Enzinger Ewald

Funder

Southwest University of Political Science and Law

National Social Science Foundation of China Key Program

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Law

Reference80 articles.

1. Voiceprint recognition;Kersta;Nature,1962

2. Voice Identification: Theory and Legal Applications;Tosi,1979

3. On the Theory and Practice of Voice Identification;National Research Council,1979

4. Voicegram identification evidence;Gruber;Am. Jurisprud. Trials,1995

5. INTERPOL survey of the use of speaker identification by law enforcement agencies;Morrison;Forensic Sci. Int.,2016

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Weight of authorship evidence with multiple categories of stylometric features: A multinomial-based discrete model;Science & Justice;2023-03

2. Avoiding overstating the strength of forensic evidence: Shrunk likelihood ratios/Bayes factors;Science & Justice;2018-05

3. What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be? II;Science & Justice;2017-11

4. Empirical test of the performance of an acoustic-phonetic approach to forensic voice comparison under conditions similar to those of a real case;Forensic Science International;2017-08