Use of administrative data for comparative effectiveness research in the treatment of non-prostate genitourinary malignancies-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Use of administrative data for comparative effectiveness research in the treatment of non-prostate genitourinary malignancies

Published:2018-04 Issue:4 Volume:36 Page:193-212
ISSN:1078-1439
Container-title:Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
language:en
Short-container-title:Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

Author:

Edwards Daniel C.,Cahn David B.,Smaldone Marc C.,Kutikov Alexander

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Urology,Oncology

Reference64 articles.

1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). National Health Expenditure Fact Sheet. https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statistics-trends-and-reports/nationalhealthexpenddata/nhe-fact-sheet.html; 2017 [accessed 04.06.17].

2. Comparative effectiveness research stalls in the USA;Webster;Lancet,2010

3. Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research,2009

4. Cancer Statistics, 2017;Siegel;CA Cancer J Clin,2017

5. The burden of bladder cancer care: direct and indirect costs;Mossanen;Curr Opin Urol,2014

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000–2019;Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations;2021-08

2. Nephroureterectomy vs. segmental ureterectomy of clinically localized, high-grade, urothelial carcinoma of the ureter: Practice patterns and outcomes;Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations;2020-11

3. Administrative databases and clinical governance: The case of COPD;The International Journal of Health Planning and Management;2018-08-16