Single Center, Single Operator Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Electrohydraulic and Electromagnetic Lithotripters in the Management of 10- to 20-mm Single Upper Urinary Tract Calculi-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Single Center, Single Operator Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Electrohydraulic and Electromagnetic Lithotripters in the Management of 10- to 20-mm Single Upper Urinary Tract Calculi

Published:2008-11 Issue:5 Volume:72 Page:991-995
ISSN:0090-4295
Container-title:Urology
language:en
Short-container-title:Urology

Author:

Jamshaid Anila,Ather M. Hammad,Hussain Ghazi,Khawaja Karim B.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Urology

Reference21 articles.

1. First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves;Chaussy;J Urol,2002

2. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Hospital of India experience;Lingeman;J Urol,1986

3. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: experience with 1000 treatments;Zehntner;Schweiz Med Wochenschr,1987

4. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy?;Sofras;Br J Urol,1991

5. A report on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy results on 1,569 renal units in an outpatient clinic;Tolon;J Urol,1991

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Bacterial Effect on the Crystallization of Mineral Phases in a Solution Simulating Human Urine;Crystals;2019-05-18

2. Comparison of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptors for upper urinary tract stones in a single center;World Journal of Urology;2018-08-28

3. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review;European Urology;2017-11

4. Comparison of Electrohydraulic and Electromagnetic Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Upper Urinary Tract Stones in Elderly Patients;International Journal of Gerontology;2017-09

5. Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients;Clinical Interventions in Aging;2017-04