Perspectives and preferences regarding genomic secondary findings in underrepresented prenatal and pediatric populations: A mixed-methods approach-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Perspectives and preferences regarding genomic secondary findings in underrepresented prenatal and pediatric populations: A mixed-methods approach

Published:2022-06 Issue:6 Volume:24 Page:1206-1216
ISSN:1098-3600
Container-title:Genetics in Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:Genetics in Medicine

Author:

Rego Shannon^ORCID,Hoban Hannah,Outram Simon,Zamora Astrid N.,Chen Flavia,Sahin-Hodoglugil Nuriye,Anguiano Beatriz,Norstad Matthew,Yip Tiffany,Lianoglou Billie,Sparks Teresa N.,Norton Mary E.,Koenig Barbara A.,Slavotinek Anne M.,Ackerman Sara L.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Genetics (clinical)

Reference40 articles.

1. ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG);Miller;Genet Med,2021

2. The use of fetal exome sequencing in prenatal diagnosis: a points to consider document of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG);Monaghan;Genet Med,2020

3. Joint Position Statement from the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD), the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and the Perinatal Quality Foundation (PQF) on the use of genome-wide sequencing for fetal diagnosis;Prenat Diagn,2018

4. Disclosure of secondary findings in exome sequencing of 2480 Japanese cancer patients;Horiuchi;Hum Genet,2021

5. Choices of incidental findings of individuals undergoing genome wide sequencing, a single center’s experience;Bishop;Clin Genet,2017

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Eliciting parental preferences and values for the return of additional findings from genomic sequencing;npj Genomic Medicine;2024-02-14

2. Systematic review of the uptake and outcomes from returning secondary findings to adult participants in research genomic testing;Journal of Genetic Counseling;2024-01-10

3. Research participants' perspectives regarding the feedback of secondary findings–A cohort from the DDD‐Africa study, South Africa;Journal of Genetic Counseling;2023-11-15

4. Information-seeking preferences in diverse patients receiving a genetic testing result in the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) study;Genetics in Medicine;2023-09

5. Protocol for a Prospective, Observational Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Returning Secondary Findings of Genome Sequencing for Unexplained Suspected Genetic Conditions;Clinical Therapeutics;2023-08