Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1472, USA
Abstract
From 1982, when the Chinese government first signalled its intention to take back Hong Kong, to the actual transfer of sovereignty in 1997, the PRC engaged in a long-term campaign to “win friends and influence people” in the British colony. Hoping to prevent a large-scale flight of capital and manpower, and wishing to cultivate a core group of sympathetic local notables as future political leaders, Beijing issued frequent pledges of non-interference in Hong Kong's affairs and adopted classic “united front” tactics — flattering, cajoling, and otherwise wooing potential supporters while snubbing (and sometimes smearing) outspoken critics. Despite intensely negative local reaction to the 1989 “Tiananmen Massacre”, over the long haul Beijing largely succeeded in disarming public fears of a heavyhanded Chinese takeover. Consequently, the handover itself was an extremely calm, tranquil affair. And in the first 2 years of Hong Kong's new status as a “Special Administrative Region” of China, the PRC earned generally high marks for honoring its pledge to uphold the principle of “one country, two systems”.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Development
Reference33 articles.
1. Letter from Hong Kong: China rules;Baum;UCLA Magazine,1997
2. Britain's “betrayal” of Hong Kong: a second look;Baum;Journal of Contemporary China,1999
3. Baum, R., 1999b. Democracy deformed: Hong Kong's 1998 legislative elections — and beyond. Paper presented at the Conference on Elections in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Mainland China, The Hoover Institution (5–6 March).
4. The structure of communist party control in Hong Kong;Burns;Asian Survey,1990
5. Burns, J., 1994. The role of the New China News Agency. Hong Kong and China in Transition: Canada and Hong Kong Papers (3). Joint Centre for Asia Pacific Studies, University of Toronto.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献