You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t (always) make it drink: postive freedom in the aftermath of German unification

Author:

Davidson-Schmich L.K.1,Hartmann K.2,Mummert U.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science, University of Miami, P.O. Box 248047, Coral Gables, FL 33124-65334, USA

2. Institut für interdisziplinäre und angewandte Diakoniewissenschaft, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Fliednerstraße 2, D-45481 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Bonn, Germany

3. Department of Economics, Georg-Simon-Ohm Fachhochschule, (Nürnberg University of Applied Sciences), 90402 Nürnberg, Germany

Abstract

This article investigates the degree to which the East Germans have acted on the freedoms they gained after the fall of the German Democratic Republic (GDR). Initially, many observers expected that the East Germans would quickly take advantage of their political, religious, and economic freedoms to become as entrepreneurial, partisan, and religious as their Western counterparts. Over the past decade, however, social scientists have discovered the persistence of ‘Leninist legacies,’ arguing that the East Europeans’ socialization under communism will make them reluctant to act on the before-mentioned freedoms. Contrary to both of these expectations, we find considerable variation in the Easterners’ behavior. In the economic sphere, while the Easterners have been willing to engage in legal market activity, they have been reluctant to get involved with gray market activity. In the political realm the elites have embraced partisan politics more thoroughly than have ordinary citizens. Finally, the Easterners have flocked neither to the Catholic and Protestant churches nor to new religious movements like Scientology. These results suggest that the combination of Western rights and Eastern Leninist legacies has created a unique incentive structure in East Germany. The Easterners face a different cost-benefit calculus than do the Westerners and, as a result, at times are less willing to act on their positive freedoms.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Development

Reference54 articles.

1. Barker, E., 1993. Neue religiöse Bewegungen. Religiöser Pluralismus in der westlichen Welt, in: Religion und Kultur, Sonderheft 33 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 231-248.

2. But who’s going to win? National and minority religions in post-communist society;Barker,1997

3. The enfant terrible of German politics: the PDS between GDR nostalgia and democratic socialism;Bastian;German Politics,1995

4. Was geschah mit den oppositionellen Gruppen und ihren Mitglieder nach der friedlichen revolution?;Baukloh,2001

5. Cult Controversies. The Societal Response to the New Religious Movements;Beckford,1985

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3