Patterns and practices in fisheries assessment peer review systems-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Patterns and practices in fisheries assessment peer review systems

Published:2020-07 Issue: Volume:117 Page:103880
ISSN:0308-597X
Container-title:Marine Policy
language:en
Short-container-title:Marine Policy

Author:

Brown Stephen K.,Shivlani Manoj,Koeneke Roberto F.,Agnew David,Byrd Julia,Cryer Martin,Dichmont Cathy,Die David,Michaels William,Reid Keith,Rice Jake,Sparholt Henrik,Weinberg James

Funder

National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics,General Environmental Science,Aquatic Science

Reference36 articles.

1. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 - Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals,2018

2. Defining and implementing best available science for fisheries and environmental science, policy, and management;Sullivan;Fisheries,2006

3. Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy;Chubin,1990

4. Office of Management and Budget, Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review,2004

5. Improving the Use of the “Best Available Information” Standard in Fisheries Management;National Research Council,2004

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Estimating the numbers of aquatic birds affected by oil spills: pre-planning, response, and post-incident considerations;Environmental Reviews;2022-06

2. Untimely publications: Delayed Canadian fisheries science advice limits transparency of decision-making;Marine Policy;2021-10

3. Beyond visualizing catch-at-age models: Lessons learned from the r4ss package about software to support stock assessments;Fisheries Research;2021-07