Author:
Smuin Dallas M.,Vannatta Emily,Ammerman Brittany,Stauch Christopher M.,Lewis Gregory S.,Dhawan Aman
Funder
National Institutes of Health
Pennsylvania State University
Arthrex
U.S. Department of Defense
Smith and Nephew
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. All-Suture Anchor Techniques for Biceps Tenodesis Are Noninferior in End-Cycle Stiffness to an Interference Screw Technique; However, Secondary Outcomes, Such as Ultimate Failure Load, Yield Load, Creep, and Load-to-Failure Stiffness, Are Inferior in an Ovine Model;Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation;2024-06
2. All-suture anchor size and drill angle influence load to failure in a porcine model of subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a biomechanical study;BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;2024-05-23
3. Biomechanical comparisons of all--suture suspensory button vs. interference screw for inlay subpectoral bicep tenodesis;Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery;2024-05
4. All-suture anchor size and drill angle influence load to failure in a porcine model of subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a biomechanical study;2023-12-26
5. Biomechanical properties of suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with double-anchor knotless luggage tag sutures vs. subpectoral biceps tenodesis with single-anchor whipstitch suture using all-suture anchors;JSES International;2023-11