Evaluation of auditor decisions: Hindsight bias effects and the expectation gap-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Evaluation of auditor decisions: Hindsight bias effects and the expectation gap

Published:1993-12 Issue:4 Volume:14 Page:711-737
ISSN:0167-4870
Container-title:Journal of Economic Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Economic Psychology

Author:

Anderson John C.,Lowe D.Jordan,Reckers Philip M.J.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Applied Psychology,Sociology and Political Science

Reference40 articles.

1. Reports on audited financial statements;American Institute of Certified Public Accountants;Statement on Auditing Standards No. 58,1988

2. Judges' and auditors' perceptions of auditor liability relating to use of diagnostic decision aids for analytical procedures;Anderson;Working Paper,1993

3. Is hindsight a fair judge of foresight: An experimental investigation of second-guessing;Anderson,1986

4. Eliminating the hindsight bias;Arkes;Journal of Applied Psychology,1988

Cited by 55 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Menschliche Entscheidungen verstehen und Entscheidungsfallen vermeiden;Praxisorientiertes Managementwissen;2024

2. A general model of cognitive bias in human judgment and systematic review specific to forensic mental health.;Law and Human Behavior;2022-04

3. The Role of Audit Firms in Spreading Depositor Contagion;The Accounting Review;2021-08-18

4. Taking a naïve other's perspective to debias the hindsight bias: Did it backfire?;New Ideas in Psychology;2021-08

5. Behavioral Economics and Court Decision-Making;Review of Law & Economics;2021-07-01