Adoption rates of laparoscopic techniques for colorectal resections among Brazilian surgeons: limiting factors affecting incorporation into daily practice

Author:

Campos Fábio Guilherme1,Bertoncini Alexandre Bruno1,Martinez Carlos Augusto Real23,Bustamante-Lopez Leonardo Alphonso1,Morais Paula Gabriela Melo1

Affiliation:

1. Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

2. Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil

3. Universidade de São Francisco, Bragança Paulista, SP, Brazil

Abstract

AbstractRoutine adoption of laparoscopy in clinical practice and Medical Residency has not been widely evaluated in Brazil so far. Aim To take an overview on the adoption and limitations concerning the use of laparoscopic techniques among Brazilian colorectal surgeons. Methods A questionnaire was sent to 1870 SBCP filiated members, containing personal and professional data such as sex, age, length and local of practice, SBCP filliation, number of procedures, treatment of cancer and laparoscopy limitations. Results 418 members (22.4%) sent their response (80% men and 20% women). 110 members (26.3%) affirmed they don’t perform any laparoscopic procedure, while 308 (73.7%) have already adopted laparoscopy as a routine. An average number of 7.6 laparoscopic colorectal procedures were declared to be performed per month (1 to 40 procedures). Laparoscopic adoption rates were favourably influenced by young age members (46% vs. 28%) and affiliation to University hospitals (p = 0.01). Conversely, surgeons from private clinic showed a greater tendency of no adoption. Among the 308 responders, 106 (34.4%) have already surpassed more than 100 laparoscopic cases, and 167 (54.2%) reported an experience of more than 50 operated patients. The group of surgeons not using minimally invasive techniques incriminated lack of training (73.6%) and laparoscopic instruments availability (27.3%) as the main reasons for no adoption. Conclusions Adoption rate of laparoscopic techniques to treat colorectal diseases is still low (at least 17%). Future efforts should focus on providing supervised training, proctorship during the initial experience and help instrumental acquisition in centers willing to change their routine and perspectives.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology

Reference21 articles.

1. Tratamento do câncer colo-retal – Seleção dos pacientes, estadiamento e recidiva parietal em vídeo-cirurgia;Campos;Rev Bras Coloproct,2003

2. Abdominoperineal excision: evolution of a centenary operation;Campos;Dis Colon Rectum,2012

3. Complications and conversions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Results of a multicenter Brazilian trial;Campos;Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2003

4. Variations in laparoscopic colectomy utilization in the United States;Moghadamyeghaneh;Dis Colon Rectum,2015

5. Adoption of laparoscopy for elective colorectal resection: a report from Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. The Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) Collaborative;Kwon;J Am Coll Surg,2012

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3