Current practices in the management of temporary mechanical circulatory support: A survey of CICU directors in North America-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Current practices in the management of temporary mechanical circulatory support: A survey of CICU directors in North America

Published:2024-10 Issue: Volume:276 Page:115-119
ISSN:0002-8703
Container-title:American Heart Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:American Heart Journal

Author:

Balgobind Amrita^ORCID,Pierce Matthew,Alviar Carlos,Barnett Christopher,Barsness Gregory,Chaudhry Sunit-preet,Chonde Meshe,Cooper Howard,Daniels Lori,Gidwani Umesh,Fordyce Christopher,Goldfarb Michael,Katz Jason N.,Kontos Michael,Kwon Younghoon,Liebner Evan,Liu Shuangbo,Miller P. Elliott,Newby L.K.,O'Brien Connor,Papolos Alexander,Pisani Barbara,Potter Brian,Proudfoot Alastair,Roswell Robert O.,Sinha Shashank S.,Smith Timothy D.,Thompson Andrea D.,van Diepen Sean,Zakaria Sammy,Morrow David,Villela Miguel Alvarez^ORCID

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Reference9 articles.

1. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial;Thiele;Lancet,2013

2. Long-term 5-year outcome of the randomized IMPRESS in severe shock trial: percutaneous mechanical circulatory support vs. intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction;Karami;Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care,2021

3. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study;O’Neill;Circulation,2012

4. Microaxial flow pump or standard care in infarct-related cardiogenic shock;Moller;N Engl J Med,2024

5. Clinical practice patterns in temporary mechanical circulatory support for shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry;Berg;Circ Heart Fail,2019