1. The computations of the effect of the attraction of the mountain masses as disturbing the apparent astronomical latitude of stations in geodetic surveys;Airy;Transaction of the Royal Society. (London), Series B,1855
2. Comparsion of crustal thickness from two gravimetric–isostatic models and CRUST2.0;Bagherbandi;Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica,2011
3. The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America;Bassin;EOS Trans American Geophysics Union (AGU),2000
4. Antarctic crustal thickness from satellite gravity: Implications for the Transantarctic and Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains;Block;Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2009
5. Bouman, J., 1998. Quality of Regularization Methods. Delft – Institute for Earth-Oriented Space (DEOS) Report No. 98.2. Delft University Press.