Measuring social preferences for conservation management in Australia-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Measuring social preferences for conservation management in Australia

Published:2021-10 Issue: Volume:262 Page:109323
ISSN:0006-3207
Container-title:Biological Conservation
language:en
Short-container-title:Biological Conservation

Author:

Zander Kerstin K.,St-Laurent Guillaume Peterson,Hogg Carolyn J.,Sunnucks Paul,Woinarski John,Legge Sarah,Burton Michael,Pandit Ram,Hagerman Shannon,Garnett Stephen T.

Funder

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Australian Government

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference106 articles.

1. Assisted migration, risks and scientific uncertainty, and ethics: a comment on Albrecht et al.’s review paper;Ahteensuu;J. Agric. Environ. Ethics,2014

2. The ethics of assisted colonization in the age of anthropogenic climate change;Albrecht;J. Agric. Environ. Ethics,2013

3. A Critique of Techno-optimism;Alexander,2019

4. Unrealistic techno-optimism is holding back progress on resource efficiency;Allwood;Nat. Mater.,2018

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The feasibility of implementing management for threatened birds in Australia;Emu - Austral Ornithology;2024-01-02

2. Social valuation of biodiversity relative to other types of assets at risk in wildfire;Conservation Biology;2023-12-19

3. Investigating the Market Value of Brumbies (Equus caballus) in the Australian Riding Horse Market;Animals;2023-04-27

4. Making choices: prioritising the protection of biodiversity in wildfires;International Journal of Wildland Fire;2023-04-26

5. The Australian public worries more about losing species than the costs of keeping them;Environmental Conservation;2023-03-16