1. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science;Open Science Collaboration;Science,2015
2. Why most published research findings are false;Ioannidis;PLoS Med.,2005
3. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience;Button;Nat. Rev. Neurosci.,2013
4. The garden of forking paths: why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no fishing expedition or p-hacking and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time;Gelman;Psychol. Bull.,2014
5. D.J. Benjamin, J.O. Berger, M. Johannesson, B.A. Nosek, E.-J. Wagenmakers, R. Berk, K.A. Bollen, B. Brembs, L. Brown, C. Camerer, D. Cesarini, C.D. Chambers, M. Clyde, T.D. Cook, P. De Boeck, Z. Dienes, A. Dreber, K. Easwaran, C. Efferson, E. Fehr, F. Fidler, A.P. Field, M. Forster, E.I. George, R. Gonzalez, S. Goodman, E. Green, D.P. Green, A.G. Greenwald, J.D. Hadfield, L.V. Hedges, L. Held, T. Hua Ho, H. Hoijtink, D.J. Hruschka, K. Imai, G. Imbens, J.P.A. Ioannidis, M. Jeon, J.H. Jones, M. Kirchler, D. Laibson, J. List, R. Little, A. Lupia, E. Machery, S.E. Maxwell, M. McCarthy, D.A. Moore, S.L. Morgan, M. Munafó, S. Nakagawa, B. Nyhan, T.H. Parker, L. Pericchi, M. Perugini, J. Rouder, J. Rousseau, V. Savalei, F.D. Schönbrodt, T. Sellke, B. Sinclair, D. Tingley, T. Van Zandt, S. Vazire, D.J. Watts, C. Winship, R.L. Wolpert, Y. Xie, C. Young, J. Zinman, V.E. Johnson, Redefine statistical significance, Nat. Hum. Behav., arXiv:mky9j, 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z〉. 〈http://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0189-z〉.