Does comparative effectiveness research promote rationing of cancer care?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Does comparative effectiveness research promote rationing of cancer care?

Published:2014-03 Issue:3 Volume:15 Page:e132-e138
ISSN:1470-2045
Container-title:The Lancet Oncology
language:en
Short-container-title:The Lancet Oncology

Author:

Peppercorn Jeffrey,Zafar S Yousuf,Houck Kevin,Ubel Peter,Meropol Neal J

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Oncology

Reference44 articles.

1. Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries;Sullivan;Lancet Oncol,2011

2. Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research: Institute of Medicine,2009

3. Comparative effectiveness research in oncology;Lyman;Oncologist,2013

4. Comparative effectiveness research: policy and politics;Zusman;Neurosurg Focus,2012

5. Comparative effectiveness research under Obamacare: a slippery slope to health care rationing the heritage foundation backgrounder;Nix;Backgrounder,2012

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The sociology of rationing: Towards increased interdisciplinary dialogue ‐ A critical interpretive literature review;Sociology of Health & Illness;2022-06-12

2. Real-world direct healthcare costs of treating recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer with cytotoxic chemotherapy;Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research;2020-06

3. A review of the value of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies in breast cancer;European Journal of Cancer;2018-01

4. Comparing Quality of Life in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy with Other Chronic Debilitating Diseases Using the Short Form Survey 36-Health Survey;World Neurosurgery;2017-10

5. Attitudes on cost-effectiveness and equity: a cross-sectional study examining the viewpoints of medical professionals;BMJ Open;2017-07