Concordance of Physician Ratings With the Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Concordance of Physician Ratings With the Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization

Published:2011-04 Issue:14 Volume:57 Page:1546-1553
ISSN:0735-1097
Container-title:Journal of the American College of Cardiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Author:

Chan Paul S.,Brindis Ralph G.,Cohen David J.,Jones Philip G.,Gialde Elizabeth,Bach Richard G.,Curtis Jeptha,Bethea Charles F.,Shelton Marc E.,Spertus John A.

Funder

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference2 articles.

1. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization

2. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual;Fitch,2001

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Appropriateness of The Use of Tuberculosis Screening Guideline at Care and Treatment Clinic Mnazi Mmoja Hospital Zanzibar;2024-04-11

2. Rates of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in England and Wales: Impact of COURAGE and ORBITA Trials;Journal of the American Heart Association;2022-09-20

3. The extended heart: cardiac surgery serving more hospitals;European Heart Journal Supplements;2020-03-24

4. Association between procedure appropriateness and patient-reported outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention;Heart;2019-12-19

5. Appropriateness of elective percutaneous coronary intervention and impact of government health insurance scheme — A tertiary centre experience from Western India;Indian Heart Journal;2017-09