Assessment of uncertainty and credibility of predictions by the OECD QSAR Toolbox automated read-across workflow for predicting acute oral toxicity-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessment of uncertainty and credibility of predictions by the OECD QSAR Toolbox automated read-across workflow for predicting acute oral toxicity

Published:2022-05 Issue: Volume:22 Page:100219
ISSN:2468-1113
Container-title:Computational Toxicology
language:en
Short-container-title:Computational Toxicology

Author:

Schultz Terry W.,Chapkanov Atanas,Kutsarova Stela,Mekenyan Ovanes G.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Computer Science Applications,Toxicology

Reference42 articles.

1. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals, Second Edition, No. 194, Series on Testing & Assessment. ENV/JM/MONO(2014)4, OECD, Paris, 2014.

2. A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments;Wu;Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.,2010

3. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC), Technical Report 116 Category approaches, read-across, (Q)SAR. ECETOC, Brussels, 2012.

4. Use of category approaches, read-across and (Q)SAR: general considerations;Patlewicz;Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.,2013

5. Building scientific confidence in the development and evaluation of read-across;Patlewicz;Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.,2015

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Uncertainty in the results from oral repeated dose toxicity tests: Impact on regulatory classifications;Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology;2024-01

2. Principles and procedures for assessment of acute toxicity incorporating in silico methods;Computational Toxicology;2022-11