Explanatory models for homeopathy: from the vital force to the current paradigm

Author:

Bonamin Leoni Villano1,Waisse Silvia2

Affiliation:

1. Research Center of Paulista University, Graduation Program of Environmental and Experimental Pathology, Rua Dr Bacelar 1212, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

2. Center Simão Mathias of Studies in History of Science (CESIMA), Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo, Rua Caio Prado 102, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Abstract

Facing claims for and against the scientific status of homeopathy, one is entitled to ask: is there a scientific model for homeopathy? In this study we reconstructed the model put forward by Hahnemann. The results showed that it was essentially based on the assumption of a ‘vital force’ exclusive to living beings. While the vital force was a basic element of 18th-century science, the existence of such a sui generis force of nature was refuted with the formulation of the law of the conservation of energy by mid-19th century. As a function of that fact for homeopathic theory, we discuss the history of the rise and demise of the theory of the vital force from the last quarter of the 18th century to 1830. Finally, we call the attention to the paradigm shift biology underwent starting at the end of the 19th century as the framework for contemporary views on the functioning of living beings and consequently, of the effects of pharmacological agents on them.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Complementary and alternative medicine

Reference40 articles.

1. Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Technical note 1297;Taylor,1994

2. The science of living matter and the autonomy of life: vitalism, antivitalism and neovitalism in the long German nineteenth century;Waisse,2010

3. Geist der homöopatischen Heillehre (1833);Hahnemann,2001

4. Geist der homöopatischen Heillehre (1833);Hahnemann,2001

5. How can we get more reliable information from homoeopathic pathogenetic trials? A critique of provings;Dantas;Br Homeop J,1996

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3