Is there any range-of-motion advantage to using bearings larger than 36 mm in primary hip arthroplasty: A case-control study comparing 36-mm and large-diameter heads-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Is there any range-of-motion advantage to using bearings larger than 36 mm in primary hip arthroplasty: A case-control study comparing 36-mm and large-diameter heads

Published:2016-10 Issue:6 Volume:102 Page:735-740
ISSN:1877-0568
Container-title:Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research

Author:

Delay C.^ORCID,Putman S.,Dereudre G.,Girard J.,Lancelier-Bariatinsky V.,Drumez E.,Migaud H.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Reference36 articles.

1. The long-term results of a low friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention;Charnley;J Bone Joint Surg Br,1972

2. Component impingement in total hip arthroplasty: frequency and risk factors. A continuous retrieval analysis series of 416 cup;Marchetti;Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2011

3. Short-term evaluation of thin acetabular liners on 36mm femoral heads;Johnson;Clin Orthop Relat Res,2014

4. Range-of-motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28, 32, 38 and 44mm femoral head size: an in vitro study;Burroughs;J Arthroplasty,2005

5. Effect of head diameter on passive and active dynamic hip dislocation;Bunn;J Orthop Res,2014

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty: Analysis of risk factors and preventive options;World Journal of Orthopedics;2024-06-18

2. Increasing femoral head size from 32 mm to 36 mm does not increase the revision risk for total hip replacement: a New Zealand joint registry study;HIP International;2023-11-06

3. Finite Element Study on Stability in the Femoral Neck and Head Connection to Varying Geometric Parameters with the Relates Implications on the Effect of Wear;Journal of Composites Science;2023-09-14

4. Cementless metal-on-metal versus ceramic-on-polyethylene hip arthroplasty in under-50 year-olds with 20 to 22 years’ follow-up: Was it a good idea to abandon the small-diameter metal-on-metal bearing?;Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research;2023-02

5. Arthroplastie de hanche métal-métal sans ciment versus céramique-polyéthylène chez des patients de moins de 50 ans avec un suivi de 20 à 22 ans : avons-nous fait le bon choix en abandonnant le couple métal-métal de petit diamètre ?;Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique;2023-02