Most published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 were redundant and lacked currency-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Most published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 were redundant and lacked currency

Published:2022-06 Issue: Volume:146 Page:22-31
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

McDonald Steve^ORCID,Turner Simon^ORCID,Page Matthew J.,Turner Tari

Funder

Monash University

Australian Research Council

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference74 articles.

1. How COVID broke the evidence pipeline;Pearson;Nature,2021

2. Characteristics, quality and volume of the first 5 months of the COVID-19 evidence synthesis infodemic: a meta-research study;Abbott;BMJ Evid Based Med,2021

3. Waste in covid-19 research;Glasziou;BMJ,2020

4. Methodological quality of COVID-19 clinical research;Jung;Nat Commun,2021

5. The truth is out there, somewhere;Lancet,2020

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Methods for conducting a living evidence profile on mpox: An evidence map of the literature;Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods;2024-02

2. Learning health systems and evidence ecosystems: a perspective on the future of evidence-based medicine and evidence-based guideline development;Health Research Policy and Systems;2024-01-04

3. Evidence surveillance for a living clinical guideline: Case study of the Australian stroke guidelines;Health Information & Libraries Journal;2023-11-09

4. A framework to characterise the reproducibility of meta‐analysis results with its application to direct oral anticoagulants in the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism;Research Synthesis Methods;2023-10-17

5. Replication of systematic reviews: is it to the benefit or detriment of methodological quality?;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2023-10