Sensitivity subgroup analysis based on single-center vs. multi-center trial status when interpreting meta-analyses pooled estimates: the logical way forward
-
Published:2016-06
Issue:
Volume:74
Page:80-92
-
ISSN:0895-4356
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Author:
Alexander Paul E.,
Bonner Ashley J.,
Agarwal Arnav,
Li Shelly-Anne,
Hariharan Abishek,
Izhar Zain,
Bhatnagar Neera,
Alba Carolina,
Akl Elie A.,
Fei YutongORCID,
Guyatt Gordon H.,
Beyene Joseph
Reference34 articles.
1. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence;Balshem;J Clin Epidemiol,2011
2. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency;Guyatt;J Clin Epidemiol,2011
3. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies;Savović;Health Technol Assess,2012
4. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study;Wood;BMJ,2008
5. J.P. Higgins, D.G. Altman, P.C. Gøtzsche, P. Jüni, D. Moher, A.D. Oxman, et al. Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group, The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343;d5928.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献