Identification of application and interpretation errors that can occur in pairwise meta-analyses in systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Identification of application and interpretation errors that can occur in pairwise meta-analyses in systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic review

Published:2024-06 Issue: Volume:170 Page:111331
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

Kanukula Raju^ORCID,Page Matthew J.^ORCID,Turner Simon L.^ORCID,McKenzie Joanne E.^ORCID

Funder

Australian Research Council

Monash University

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Reference58 articles.

1. Chapter 10: analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses;Deeks,2023

2. Chapter 23: including variants on randomized trials;Higgins,2023

3. Performance of between-study heterogeneity measures in the Cochrane library;Ma;Epidemiology,2018

4. The lack of statistical power of subgroup analyses in meta-analyses: a cautionary note;Cuijpers;Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci,2021

5. Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis;Page;J Clin Epidemiol,2018

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Letter to the Editor of Clinical Breast Cancer, on “Omitting axillary lymph node dissection is associated with an increased risk of regional recurrence in early stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials” Conducted by Jorge Henrique Cardoso and collaborators and published in Clinical Breast Cancer doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.07.011;Clinical Breast Cancer;2024-08

2. PeRinatal, neOnatal, and Maternal OuTcomEs with azithromycin prophylaxis in pregnancy and labour (PROMOTE-PROPHYLAXIS): systematic review and meta-analysis;ECLINICALMEDICINE;2024