An encouraging assessment of methods to inform priorities for updating systematic reviews-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An encouraging assessment of methods to inform priorities for updating systematic reviews

Published:2009-03 Issue:3 Volume:62 Page:241-251
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

Sutton Alex J.,Donegan Sarah,Takwoingi Yemisi,Garner Paul,Gamble Carol,Donald Alison

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference35 articles.

1. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context,2000

2. How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis;Shojania;Ann Intern Med,2007

3. Systematic reviews: when is an update an update?;Moher;Lancet,2006

4. A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews;Moher;J Clin Epidemiol,2007

5. Lutje V. Closing Cochrane reviews. Cochrane News. December 2006. Available at http://wwwcochraneorg/newslett/CochraneNews38highrescorrectedpdf. Accessed August 2008.

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of non‐Cochrane updates of systematic reviews: A cross‐sectional study;Research Synthesis Methods;2020-04-22

2. Enough evidence and other endings: a descriptive study of stable Cochrane systematic reviews in 2019;2019-12-09

3. The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2019-06

4. Study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing: discussion and case report;Systematic Reviews;2019-05-30

5. Living network meta-analysis was feasible when considering the pace of evidence generation;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2019-04