A systematic review found no consistent difference in effect between more and less intensive placebo interventions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A systematic review found no consistent difference in effect between more and less intensive placebo interventions

Published:2015-04 Issue:4 Volume:68 Page:442-451
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

Fässler Margrit,Meissner Karin,Kleijnen Jos,Hróbjartsson Asbjørn,Linde Klaus

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference45 articles.

1. Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects;Finniss;Lancet,2010

2. Sham device v inert pill: randomised controlled trial of two placebo treatments;Kaptchuk;BMJ,2006

3. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review;Di Blasi;Lancet,2001

4. A randomised clinical trial of the effect of informed consent on the analgesic activity of placebo and naproxen in cancer pain;Bergmann;Clin Trials Metaanal,1994

5. The efficacy paradox in randomized controlled trials of CAM and elsewhere: beware of the placebo trap;Walach;J Altern Complement Med,2001

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Matched vs Nonmatched Placebos in a Randomized Trial of COVID-19 Treatments;JAMA Network Open;2024-05-20

2. The importance of context (placebo effects) in conservative interventions for musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials;European Journal of Pain;2023-12-20

3. Change in pain expectations but no open‐label placebo analgesia: An experimental study using the heat pain paradigm;European Journal of Pain;2023-12-18

4. Five challenges for manual therapies trials with placebo controls: A proposal;International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine;2022-12

5. Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2022-04-04