Decisions about lumping vs. splitting of the scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions are not well justified: A case study in systematic reviews of health care professional reminders-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Decisions about lumping vs. splitting of the scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions are not well justified: A case study in systematic reviews of health care professional reminders

Published:2012-07 Issue:7 Volume:65 Page:756-763
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

Weir Michelle C.,Grimshaw Jeremy M.,Mayhew Alain,Fergusson Dean

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference36 articles.

1. Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes;Grimshaw;Qual Saf Health Care,2003

2. Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis. It may be crucially important for patients;Gotzsche;BMJ,2000

3. Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966-1998;Grimshaw;J Gen Intern Med,2006

4. Effect of physician reminders on preventive care: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials;Austin;Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care,1994

5. The clinical value of computerized information services. A review of 98 randomized clinical trials;Balas;Arch Fam Med,1996

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis;Health Technology Assessment;2024-01

2. Can a replication revolution resolve the duplication crisis in systematic reviews?;BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine;2023-10-11

3. Supporting birth companions for women in labor, the views and experiences of birth companions, women and midwives: A mixed methods systematic review;Birth;2023-08-18

4. Evidence Gap Maps in Education Research;Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness;2022-12-01

5. Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2022-09-02