A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed

Published:2011-01 Issue:1 Volume:64 Page:79-89
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

Crowe Michael,Sheppard Lorraine

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference74 articles.

1. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD's guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews (CRD Report 4);Khan,2001

2. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies;Deeks;Health Technol Assess,2003

3. Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions;Petticrew;BMJ,2001

4. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective;Dixon-Woods;Qual Res,2006

5. Rating methodological quality: toward improved assessment and investigation;Moyer;Account Res,2005

Cited by 190 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A scoping review shows that no single existing risk of bias assessment tool considers all sources of bias for cross-sectional studies;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2024-08

2. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and terrorism: a rapid evidence assessment of risk and vulnerability factors, and implications for intervention;Safer Communities;2024-07-25

3. Resilience and mental health among perinatal women: a systematic review;Frontiers in Psychiatry;2024-07-22

4. Group schema therapy for personality disorders: Systematic review, research agenda and treatment implications;Psychotherapy Research;2024-06-11

5. Exploring the Association Between Loneliness, Subjective Cognitive Decline, and Quality of Life Among Older Thai Adults: A Convergent Parallel Mixed-Method Study;Journal of Applied Gerontology;2024-05-14