Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit

Published:2007-09 Issue:9 Volume:60 Page:869-873
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

Bassler Dirk,Ferreira-Gonzalez Ignacio,Briel Matthias,Cook Deborah J.,Devereaux P.J.,Heels-Ansdell Diane,Kirpalani Haresh,Meade Maureen O.,Montori Victor M.,Rozenberg Anna,Schünemann Holger J.,Guyatt Gordon H.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference9 articles.

1. Multiplicity in randomised trials II: subgroup and interim analyses;Schulz;Lancet,2005

2. Trials stopped early: too good to be true?;Pocock;Lancet,1999

3. When (not) to stop a clinical trial for benefit;Pocock;JAMA,2005

4. Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review;Montori;JAMA,2005

5. The impact of stopping rules on heterogeneity of results in overviews of clinical trials;Hughes;Biometrics,1992

Cited by 52 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Point estimation for adaptive trial designs II: Practical considerations and guidance;Statistics in Medicine;2023-04-05

2. Estimation of the treatment effect following a clinical trial that stopped early for benefit;Statistical Methods in Medical Research;2022-09-06

3. Clinical trials with sequential analysis that were early-stopped: How to interpret them?;Medwave;2020-06-15

4. Effects of simulated sample sizes on the mortality effect estimates in three randomized intensive care unit trials;Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica;2020-04-20

5. Sensitivity analyses assessing the impact of early stopping on systematic reviews: Recommendations for interpreting guidelines;Research Synthesis Methods;2020-02-05