Extraction of unadjusted estimates of prognostic association for meta-analysis: simulation methods as good alternatives to trend and direct method estimation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Extraction of unadjusted estimates of prognostic association for meta-analysis: simulation methods as good alternatives to trend and direct method estimation

Published:2018-07 Issue: Volume:99 Page:153-163
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

Pérez T.,McLellan J.,Perera R.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference35 articles.

1. Primer: an evidence-based approach to prognostic markers;Altman;Nat Clin Pract Oncol,2005

2. Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the future;Riley;Br J Cancer,2003

3. Systematic reviews of studies of prognostic variables;Altman,2001

4. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, editors. Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In, Higgins JPT, Green S editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed February 20, 2018.

5. Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting;Riley;BMJ,2010

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Assessing the impact of the phase-out measures during COVID-19 pandemic, using regression models: a longitudinal observational study;BMJ Open;2022-11

2. Dealing with categorical risk data when extracting data for meta-analysis;BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine;2021-01-13

3. A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies;BMJ;2019-01-30