Reporting and interpretation of effects in non-randomized nutritional and environmental epidemiology: a methods study
-
Published:2023-01
Issue:
Volume:77
Page:37-43
-
ISSN:1047-2797
-
Container-title:Annals of Epidemiology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Annals of Epidemiology
Author:
Pitre TylerORCID,
Jassal Tanvir,
Park Louis,
Coello Pablo Alonso,
de Souza Russell,
Zeraatkar Dena
Reference34 articles.
1. Systematic reviews experience major limitations in reporting absolute effects;Alonso-Coello;J Clin Epidemiol,2016
2. Choice of effect measure for meta-analyses of dichotomous outcomes influenced the identified heterogeneity and direction of small-study effects;Papageorgiou;J Clin Epidemiol,2015
3. Agarwal A., Johnston B.C., Vernooij R.W.M., Carrasco-Labra A., Brignardello-Petersen R., Neumann I., et al. Authors seldom report the most patient-important outcomes and absolute effect measures in systematic review abstracts. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;81:3–12.
4. Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions;Forrow;Am J Med,1992
5. Measured enthusiasm: does the method of reporting trial results alter perceptions of therapeutic effectiveness?;Naylor;Ann Intern Med,1992
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献