The contribution that empirical studies performed in industry make to the findings of systematic reviews: A tertiary study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The contribution that empirical studies performed in industry make to the findings of systematic reviews: A tertiary study

Published:2018-02 Issue: Volume:94 Page:234-244
ISSN:0950-5849
Container-title:Information and Software Technology
language:en
Short-container-title:Information and Software Technology

Author:

Budgen David,Brereton Pearl,Williams Nikki,Drummond Sarah

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Information Systems,Software

Reference69 articles.

1. Large-scale software engineering questions–expert opinion or empirical evidence?;Kitchenham;IET Software,2007

2. Evidence-based software engineering;Kitchenham,2004

3. What scope is there for adopting evidence-informed teaching in software engineering?;Budgen,2012

4. D. Budgen, P. Brereton, N. Williams, S. Drummond, A tertiary review of evidence about software engineering practice, 2017. (Submitted for Publication).

5. Evidence-based software engineering and systematic reviews;Kitchenham,2015

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reporting case studies in systematic literature studies—An evidential problem;Information and Software Technology;2024-10

2. Literature reviews in operations research: A new taxonomy and a meta review;Computers & Operations Research;2023-09

3. How Should Software Engineering Secondary Studies Include Grey Material?;IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering;2023-02-01

4. Assessing attitudes towards evidence-based software engineering in a government agency;Information and Software Technology;2023-02

5. Reproducible Searches in Systematic Reviews: An Evaluation and Guidelines;IEEE Access;2023