Post-battle skirmish in the risk assessment wars: Rebuttal to the response of Baumann and colleagues to criticism of their paper, “Evaluating the effectiveness of actuarial risk assessment models”-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Post-battle skirmish in the risk assessment wars: Rebuttal to the response of Baumann and colleagues to criticism of their paper, “Evaluating the effectiveness of actuarial risk assessment models”

Published:2006-09 Issue:9 Volume:28 Page:1124-1132
ISSN:0190-7409
Container-title:Children and Youth Services Review
language:en
Short-container-title:Children and Youth Services Review

Author:

Johnson Will

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Reference10 articles.

1. Evaluating the effectiveness of actuarial risk assessment models;Baumann;Children and Youth Services Review,2005

2. Remarks concerning the importance of evaluating actuarial risk assessment models: A rejoinder to Will Johnson;Baumann;Children and Youth Services Review,2006

3. The Virtues of randomness;Boruch;Education Next,2002

4. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research;Campbell,1963

5. Clinical versus actuarial judgment;Dawes;Science,1989

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Goldilocks Problem: Tensions between Actuarially Based and Clinical Judgment in Child Welfare Decision Making;Social Service Review;2020-12-01

2. Predicting child maltreatment: A meta-analysis of the predictive validity of risk assessment instruments;Child Abuse & Neglect;2017-11

3. Reentry into Out-of-Home Care: Implications of Child Welfare Workers' Assessments of Risk and Safety;Social Work Research;2012-09-01

4. Child Well-Being Scales as a Predictor of Casework Activity and Services in Child Protection;Journal of Public Child Welfare;2009-05-27