A comparison of the performance of contemporary, historical, and cross-lab controls in QTc assessment in conscious nonhuman primates-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A comparison of the performance of contemporary, historical, and cross-lab controls in QTc assessment in conscious nonhuman primates

Published:2024-05 Issue: Volume:127 Page:107510
ISSN:1056-8719
Container-title:Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods

Author:

Abernathy Matthew M.,Best Derek D.,Leishman Derek J.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Reference11 articles.

1. Anonymous;Anonymous,2000

2. ICH E14/S7B implementation working group - clinical and nonclinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and Proarrhythmic potential. Questions and Answers;Anonymous.,2022

3. Toward implementing virtual control groups in nonclinical safety studies. Altex. Doi:10.14573/altex.2310041;Golden,2023

4. Hurdles and signposts on the road to virtual control groups-a case study illustrating the influence of anesthesia protocols on electrolyte levels in rats;Gurjanov;Frontiers in Pharmacology,2023

5. Comparison of validity of standard nonclinical group size selection versus standard clinical group sizes for nonhuman primate QTc prolongation evaluation;Holdsworth;Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods,2023

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Return to SENDer: The Submitted Electronic Data for Nonclinical Cardiovascular Studies is Not Facilitating Transparency, Translation or Innovation;Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics;2024-07-17

2. Innovative approaches to cardiovascular safety pharmacology assessment;Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods;2024-07