The importance of distinguishing individual differences in ‘social impact’ versus ‘social responsiveness’ when quantifying indirect genetic effects on the evolution of social plasticity-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The importance of distinguishing individual differences in ‘social impact’ versus ‘social responsiveness’ when quantifying indirect genetic effects on the evolution of social plasticity

Published:2023-01 Issue: Volume:144 Page:104996
ISSN:0149-7634
Container-title:Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
language:en
Short-container-title:Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Author:

de Groot Corné,Wijnhorst Rori E.,Ratz Tom,Murray Myranda,Araya-Ajoy Yimen G.,Wright Jonathan,Dingemanse Niels J.

Funder

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Norges Forskningsråd

Association of German Science Foundations

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Reference182 articles.

1. On the relationship between quantitative genetic and ESS models;Abrams;Evolution,1993

2. Indirect genetic effects contribute substantially to heritable variation in aggression-related traits in group-housed mink (Neovison vison);Alemu;Genet. Sel. Evol.,2014

3. Integrating the how and why of within-individual and among-individual variation and plasticity in behavior;Alonzo;Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci.,2015

4. Density-regulated selection with genotypic interactions;Anderson;Am. Nat.,1983

5. Consistent individual differences in the social phenotypes of wild great tits, Parus major;Aplin;Anim. Behav.,2015

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Indirect genetic effects increase the heritable variation available to selection and are largest for behaviours: a meta-analysis;2024-05-21

2. Social interactions generate complex selection patterns in virtual worlds;Journal of Evolutionary Biology;2024-05-04