Affiliation:
1. Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2 2AE, UK
Abstract
This paper analyzes the effectiveness, responsiveness and accountability of local mayors in governing local development in Armenia. The research conducted in eight rural communities shows that in order to be effective, elected local mayors are compelled to resort to informal strategies to attract development resources to their communities. As formal opportunities for supporting rural livelihoods are limited, informal governance helps enhance people’s well-being and social cohesion. It also reinforces a system of “clientelistic accountability”, which ensures a significant level of responsiveness of local mayors to local needs, but also contributes to the disempowerment of citizens and leaves them vulnerable to corruption and mismanagement.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Development
Reference50 articles.
1. Social Accountability in the Public Sector. A Conceptual Discussion;Ackerman,2005
2. Anticorruption in Transition 3: Who is Succeeding … and Why?;Anderson,2006
3. Promoting Institutional Change in Post-Soviet Armenia: Is Social Capital the ‘Missing Link’?;Babajanian,2007
4. Local government finance in transition economies;Bird,1994
5. Participation and accountability at the periphery: democratic local governance in six countries;Blair;World Development,2000
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献