Why politicians want constitutional courts: the Russian case

Author:

Thorson Carla1

Affiliation:

1. Political Science Department, UCLA, 4289 Bunche Hall, P.O. Box 951472, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angles, CA 90095-1472, USA

Abstract

Why are judicial review mechanisms being incorporated into so many democratizing states? This study analyzes why politicians create an independent judicial institution with the authority to overrule their own decisions. It sheds light on the role constitutional courts play in the consolidation phase of a democratic transition, focusing on one of those countries with no tradition of independent judicial review or of democratic forms of governance—Russia. Past practices and historical precedent do not support the formation of an independent judiciary in Russia, and yet a potentially powerful constitutional court now exists. Moreover, during the course of the transition from the Soviet state to the Russian Republic, there were three attempts to create an independent judicial review mechanism only one of which could be termed a success. This analysis focuses on the self-interested calculations of politicians in forming each of these three institutions, demonstrating that political actors establish a constitutional court to enhance their democratic credibility.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Development

Reference25 articles.

1. Constitution (Basic Law) of the Russian Federation—Russia [Konstitutsiya (Osnovnoi Zakon) Rossiiskoi Federatsii—Rossii], 1993. Izdaniye Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiiskoi Federatsii, Moscow.

2. Constitution of the Russian Federation: Draft with Commentary [Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii: proekt s kommentariyami], 1991. Moscow and Krasnoyarsk.

3. Congress of People’s Deputies debate on the creation of the Committee for Constitutional Oversight, 1990. Foreign Broadcast Information Service, 27th February.

4. Federal Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation [Federal’nii Konstitutsionnii Zakon o Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiiskoi Federatsii], 1995. Gazette of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation [Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii], vol. 1.

5. Independent judges, independent judiciary: explaining judicial independence;Ferejohn;Southern California Law Review,1999

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3