Affiliation:
1. Brown University, Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, USA
Abstract
It is established that Party-army relation followed a “separated” pattern in the Soviet Union as opposed to an “infused” pattern in China. This article explores the historical origin of this difference in the revolutionary periods. By analyzing the biographies of communist military elites, it argues that this discrepancy took shape before the revolutionary takeover and resulted from the differentiated intensities of warfare across Russia and China. In China, the numerous civil wars and military defeats, radicalized the old military structure and boosted societal militarization; thus, eroding the mutual exclusion between the military and revolutionaries. The effect was lesser in Tsarist Russia than in prerevolutionary China, making the old military a conservative and professional corporate that the Bolsheviks could not completely subordinate to Party control.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Development
Reference135 articles.
1. The Revolutionary Armies: the Historical Development of the Soviet and the Chinese People's Liberation Armies;Adelman,1980
2. The impact of civil wars on communist political culture: the Soviet and Chinese cases;Adelman;Stud. Comp. Communism,1983
3. Alexander Shlyapnikov, 1885–1937: Life of an Old Bolshevik;Allen,2015
4. Vospominaniia Pis'ma [Memories in Letters;Andreev,1985
5. The Revolution of 1905;Ascher,1988
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献