Affiliation:
1. Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-6165, United States
Abstract
What determined Russia’s national interests and grand strategy in the first decade after the Cold War? This article uses aspirational constructivism, which combines social psychology with constructivism, to answer this question. Central to aspirational constructivism are the roles that the past self and in-groups, and their perceived effectiveness play in the selection of a national identity and the definition of national interests. This article explains why Russian political elites settled on a statist national identity that focused on retaining Russia’s historical status as a Western great power and hegemon in the former Soviet Union and in engaging the country in bounded status competition with the United States.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Development
Reference75 articles.
1. The Russo-American dispute over the invasion of Iraq: international status and the role of positional goods;Ambrosio;Europe–Asia Stud.,2005
2. Russia's foreign policy alternatives;Arbatov;Int. Secur.,1993
3. Russian foreign policy thinking in transition;Arbatov,1997
4. The vicissitudes of Russian politics;Arbatov,1997
5. Vostochnyi Vopros dlia Rossii;Bogaturov;Nezavisimaia Gazeta,1992
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献