Affiliation:
1. Instructional Television, Los Angeles Mission College, USA
Abstract
Although much IR theory focuses on balancing, this paper examines a version of the wedge strategy, what Stalin allegedly called being “the laughing third man in a fight.” This is the practice of advancing one’s goals by setting up other states to fight each other. The first case study is Soviet strategy in Europe from September 1939 until June 1941. The second is Soviet strategy in the Far East in 1941–45. What I am looking at here is a policy of deliberately encouraging the start of a war and/or aiding its prolongation in order to weaken both sides. The two case studies indicate that the Soviet Union used such a strategy at times in place of the usual forms of balancing, discussed in the international relations literature. Additionally, analysis of Moscow’s conduct, statements by Soviet leaders, and the policies of a number of foreign communist parties indicate that, in addition to any security goals, Stalin’s agenda included furthering the USSR’s goal as a revolutionary state, even thought this had at times to be constrained by realpolitik.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Development
Reference65 articles.
1. China 1945: Mao's Revolution and America's Fateful Choice;Bernstein,2014
2. “We are virtually at war with Russia”: Britain and the Cold War in East Asia, 1923-40;Best;Cold War Hist.,2012
3. Aspects of Soviet-Mongolian relations, 1929-1939;Boikova,1999
4. Stalin's Failure in China 1924-1927;Brandt,1958
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献