Clarifying hierarchical age–period–cohort models: A rejoinder to Bell and Jones-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Clarifying hierarchical age–period–cohort models: A rejoinder to Bell and Jones

Published:2015-11 Issue: Volume:145 Page:125-128
ISSN:0277-9536
Container-title:Social Science & Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:Social Science & Medicine

Author:

Reither Eric N.,Land Kenneth C.,Jeon Sun Y.,Powers Daniel A.,Masters Ryan K.,Zheng Hui,Hardy Melissa A.,Keyes Katherine M.,Fu Qiang,Hanson Heidi A.,Smith Ken R.,Utz Rebecca L.,Claire Yang Y.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Health(social science)

Reference3 articles.

1. Should age-period-cohort analysts accept innovation without scrutiny? A response to Reither, Masters, Yang, Powers, Zheng and Land;Bell;Soc. Sci. Med.,2015

2. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing;R Core Team,2015

3. Should age-period-cohort studies return to the methodologies of the 1970s?;Reither;Soc. Sci. Med.,2015

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Owning housing units versus owning the residence: The divergence between two types of homeownership rates in urban China since 2008;Cities;2024-10

2. Pediatric obesity in the United States: Age–period–cohort analysis;Heliyon;2024-06

3. The recession generation? Age-period-cohort dynamics of political trust in six countries severely affected by the 2008 crisis;Frontiers in Political Science;2024-02-29

4. Bad Jobs on the Rise? Age, Period, and Cohort Effects on Low-Paid Work in Hong Kong, 1986–2016;Social Indicators Research;2023-10-30

5. Stalled and uneven? A hierarchical age-period-cohort analysis of gender attitudes in the public sphere in China 1995–2018;Chinese Sociological Review;2023-02-20