Evaluation and control of industrial inspection: Part II – The scientific basis for the guide1 1The recommendations provided in this guide are based on numerous published and unpublished scientific studies and are intended to enhance worker safety and productivity. These recommendations are neither intended to replace existing standards, if any, nor should they be treated as standards. Furthermore, this document should not be construed to represent institutional policy.The following individuals participated in the discussion of the earlier version of this guide. Their suggestions (written or verbal) were incorporated by the authors in this version: A. Aaras, Norway; J.E. Fernandez, USA; A. Freivalds, USA; M. Jager, Germany; S. Konz, USA; S. Kumar, Canada; H. Krueger, Switzerland; K. Landau, Germany; A. Luttmann, Germany; A. Mital, USA; J.D. Ramsey, USA; M.-J. Wang, Taiwan.
Reference92 articles.
1. Decision making in quality control: some perceptual and behavioural considerations;Adams,1975
2. An RSM investigation of defect rate and other variables which influence inspection;Ainsworth,1982
3. A study of human factors in inspection of rubber goods;Astley,1975
4. The problems of industrial training;Belbin;British Management Review,1955
5. New fields for quality control;Belbin;British Management Review,1957