Why small low-powered studies are worse than large high-powered studies and how to protect against “trivial” findings in research: Comment on Friston (2012)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Why small low-powered studies are worse than large high-powered studies and how to protect against “trivial” findings in research: Comment on Friston (2012)

Published:2013-11 Issue: Volume:81 Page:496-498
ISSN:1053-8119
Container-title:NeuroImage
language:en
Short-container-title:NeuroImage

Author:

Ingre Michael

Funder

Swedish Council for Working Life and Social research (FAS)

Stockholm Stress Center (SSC)

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Neurology

Reference16 articles.

1. Reporting standards for research in psychology: why do we need them? What might they be?;APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards;Am. Psychol.,2008

2. Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers;Friston;Neuroimage,2012

3. Why most published research findings are false;Ioannidis;PLoS Med.,2005

4. Why most discovered true associations are inflated;Ioannidis;Epidemiology,2008

Cited by 62 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

2. Industry Sponsorship Bias in Collagenase Clinical Trials for Dupuytren Disease;Annals of Plastic Surgery;2024-04

3. Brain Morphometry is an Advanced Method of Neuroimaging Mapping in Children;Current Pediatrics;2024-01-12

4. Cue‐reactivity to brand logos of consumers with a compulsive buying tendency: A consumer neuroscience perspective;Psychology & Marketing;2023-11-30

5. Oral language interventions can improve language outcomes in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis;Campbell Systematic Reviews;2023-11-27