Accuracy of Right and Left Ventricular Functional Assessment by Short-Axis vs Axial Cine Steady-State Free-Precession Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Intrapatient Correlation with Main Pulmonary Artery and Ascending Aorta Phase-Contrast Flow Measurements

Author:

James Susan H.1,Wald Rachel2,Wintersperger Bernd J.13,Jimenez-Juan Laura1,Deva Djeven1,Crean Andrew M.12,Nguyen Elsie1,Paul Narinder S.1,Ley Sebastian14

Affiliation:

1. Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. Division of Cardiology, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospitals Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany

4. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Abstract

Objective The left ventricle (LV) is routinely assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by using short-axis orientation; it remains unclear whether the right ventricle (RV) can also be adequately assessed in this orientation or whether dedicated axial orientation is required. We used phase-contrast (PC) flow measurements in the main pulmonary artery (MPA) and the ascending aorta (Aorta) as nonvolumetric standard of reference and compared RV and LV volumes in short-axis and axial orientations. Methods A retrospective analysis identified 30 patients with cardiac MRI data sets. Patients underwent MRI (1.5 T or 3 T), with retrospectively gated cine steady-state free-precession in axial and short-axis orientations. PC flow analyses of MPA and Aorta were used as the reference measure of RV and LV output. Results There was a high linear correlation between MPA-PC flow and RV–stroke volume (SV) short axis ( r = 0.9) and RV-SV axial ( r = 0.9). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean offset of 1.4 mL for RV axial and −2.3 mL for RV–short-axis vs MPA-PC flow. There was a high linear correlation between Aorta-PC flow and LV-SV short-axis ( r = 0.9) and LV-SV axial ( r = 0.9). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean offset of 4.8 m for LV short axis and 7.0 mL for LV axial vs Aorta-PC flow. There was no significant difference ( P = .6) between short-axis–LV SV and short-axis–RV SV. Conclusion No significant impact of the slice acquisition orientation for determination of RV and LV stroke volumes was found. Therefore, cardiac magnetic resonance workflow does not need to be extended by an axial data set for patients without complex cardiac disease for assessment of biventricular function and volumes.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3