Author:
Moran Benvon,Humphrey Shannon,Seal Alexander,Berkowitz Jonathan,Zloty David
Reference21 articles.
1. A systematic review and meta-analysis: do absorbable or non-absorbable suture materials differ in cosmetic outcomes in patients requiring primary closure of facial wounds?;Gillanders;J Plast Reconst Aesthet Surg,2018
2. Crispin MK, Zhuang AR, Eisen DB. Use of 5.0 Prolene vs 5.0 fast absorbing gut during cutaneous wound closure: a randomized evaluator-blinded split wound comparative effectiveness trial. Presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery April 27, 2017 in San Francisco, California.
3. Absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures for skin closure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials;Xu;Ann Plast Surg,2016
4. Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for closure of surgical incisions;Sajid;World J Gastrointest Surg,2014
5. Comparison of poliglecaprone-25 and polyglactin-910 in cutaneous surgery;Regan;Dermatol Surg,2013
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献