Systematic Reviews of the Literature Are Not Always Either Useful Or the Best Way To Add To Science-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Systematic Reviews of the Literature Are Not Always Either Useful Or the Best Way To Add To Science

Published:2022 Issue: Volume:54 Page:2-6
ISSN:2666-688X
Container-title:EJVES Vascular Forum
language:en
Short-container-title:EJVES Vascular Forum

Author:

Powell Janet T.^ORCID,Koelemay Mark J.W.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Surgery

Reference17 articles.

1. The mass production of redundant, misleading and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analysis;Ionnadis;Millbank Q,2016

2. How systematic reviews cause research waste;Roberts;Lancet,2015

3. Interpretation of observational studies;Jepsen;Heart,2004

4. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Available at: https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/prisma/ [Accessed 10 August 2021].

5. E-cigarettes and smoking cessation in the real-word and clinical settings: a systematic review and metanalysis;Kalkhoran;Lancet Respir Med,2016

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. INTEGRA methodology for the development of integrative reviews: origins, guidelines, and recommendations;Data and Metadata;2024-09-02

2. Surgeon–Physician Co-management for Vascular Surgery in Patients: In Need of Data Multiplication or Practice Implementation?;European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery;2024-09

3. Editor's Choice – Vascular Registries Contributing to VASCUNET Collaborative Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Outcome Projects: A Scoping Review;European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery;2024-08

4. Clarifying and differentiating discoverability;Human–Computer Interaction;2024-06-13

5. Unnecessary organizational burden: a conceptual framework;Future Business Journal;2024-04-26