Medical Hypotheses 2006 impact factor rises to 1.3 – A vindication of the ‘editorial review’ system for revolutionary science-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

Medical Hypotheses 2006 impact factor rises to 1.3 – A vindication of the ‘editorial review’ system for revolutionary science

Published:2007 Issue:5 Volume:69 Page:967-969
ISSN:0306-9877
Container-title:Medical Hypotheses
language:en
Short-container-title:Medical Hypotheses

Author:

Charlton Bruce G.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

General Medicine

Reference7 articles.

1. Ideas in biomedical science: reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses;Horrobin;Med Hypotheses,1975

2. Inaugural editorial;Charlton;Med Hypotheses,2004

3. Science as a process;Hull,1987

4. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and ’CoI consultancy’ (Editorial);Charlton;Med Hypotheses,2004

5. The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation;Horrobin;JAMA,1990

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science;Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics;2012-10

2. On objectives and achievements of the journal medical hypotheses and the utopia of following-up ‘true positives’;Medical Hypotheses;2009-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP