Affiliation:
1. Division of Biosciences, Department of Life Sciences, Centre of Inflammation Research and Translational Medicine, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK
Abstract
Burn wound infection is the leading cause of mortality among burn wound patients. One of the most commonly isolated bacterial burn wound pathogens is
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
, a notorious nosocomial multidrug-resistant pathogen. As a consequence of its recalcitrance to frontline antibiotic therapy, there is an urgent need to develop alternative treatment avenues to tackle this pathogen. One potential alternative infection prevention measure is to seed the wound bed with probiotic bacteria. Several species of Lactobacillus, a common commensal bacterium, have been previously reported to display growth inhibition activity against wound pathogens. Various species of this genus have also been shown to augment the wound healing process, which makes it a promising potential therapeutic agent. Due to the complexity of the burn wound trauma and burn wound infection, an in vivo model is required for the development of novel therapeutics. There are multiple in vivo models that are currently available, the most common among them being the murine model. However, mammalian burn wound infection models are logistically challenging, do not lend themselves to screening approaches and come with significant concerns around ethics and animal welfare. Recently, an invertebrate burn wound and infection model using G. mellonella has been established. This model addresses several of the challenges of more advanced animal models, such as affordability, maintenance and reduced ethical concerns. This study validates the capacity of this model to screen for potential wound probiotics by demonstrating that a variety of
Lactobacillus
spp. can limit
P. aeruginosa
burn wound infection and improve survival.
Funder
National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Academy of Medical Sciences
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献