Frequency of and risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Author:

Barber Katie E.1ORCID,Wagner Jamie L.1ORCID,Larry Rachel C.1,Stover Kayla R.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS, USA

Abstract

Introduction. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are an urgent threat in the USA and are associated with adverse clinical and economic outcomes. Several studies have evaluated risk factors for acquiring CRE versus carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae , identifying antibiotic use and length of hospital stay as major players. However, no studies have compared risk factors for CRE colonization versus infection. Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Patients with CRE infection will have different risk factors and worse clinical outcomes than patients with CRE colonization. Aim. To assess clinical outcomes in patients with CRE infection versus CRE colonization. Methodology. A retrospective cohort of adult patients admitted between 1 June 2013 and 31 July 2018 with the first positive CRE culture from any source was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: CRE infection versus CRE colonization. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, past antimicrobial usage and clinical outcomes (length of stay, in-hospital mortality). The primary outcome was infection-related length of stay. Data analysis was performed utilizing SPSS with a two-sided P value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results. A total of 56 patients were included (32 with infection; 24 with colonization). Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. Infected patients were more likely to have higher actual body weight compared to colonized patients (P=0.03). CRE-infected patients had a longer infection-related hospital stay [12 days (5–20) and 7.5 days (1–13), respectively; P=0.08], but in-hospital mortality was similar between infected and colonized patients (37.5 and 29.2 %, respectively; P=0.30). Patients with infection were more likely to have previous exposure to levofloxacin (P=0.02) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (P=0.03) for a median of 9 days compared to those with colonization. The most common source of CRE in infected patients was the blood compared to respiratory sources in colonized patients. Conclusion. CRE infection as opposed to colonization was more common in patients with previous exposure to levofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and those with higher actual body weight.

Publisher

Microbiology Society

Subject

Microbiology (medical),General Medicine,Microbiology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3